F. Cañas

22 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

F. Cañas
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 301
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Clinical Psychology 78
  • Microbiology 2
  • Emergency Medical Services 16
Replace J. Reilly with:
J. Reilly United Kingdom
Chike Okocha United Kingdom
David Healy Ireland
Dale A. D’Mello United States
Angelika Mehnert Belgium
Jamie Karagianis Canada
Nicola Poloni Italy
Jatinder Bains Australia
Gopinath Ranjith United Kingdom
Steven C. Stoner United States
F. Cañas relative to J. Reilly United Kingdom J. Reilly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
J. Reilly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Cañas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Cañas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Cañas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Cañas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Cañas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Cañas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Cañas. The network helps show where F. Cañas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Cañas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Cañas Line = papers co-authored together F. Cañas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006237
2 200960
3 198546
4 199326
5 201120
6 201119
7 201216
8
[Treatment adherence in schizophrenia. A comparison between patient's, relative's and psychiatrist's opinions].
200713
9
Interpersonal factors in female depression
199611
10
[Clinical characteristics and epidemiologic study of a listeriosis outbreak in Grand Canary].
19974
11 20073
12 20073
13 20242
14
Adherencia al Tratamiento en la Esquizofrenia: Consenso Clínico Español
20072
15 20002
16 20042
17 20111
18 20011
19 20121
20 20041

About F. Cañas

F. Cañas is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Family Practice and Clinical Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (301 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Clinical Psychology (78 citations), Microbiology (2 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (16 citations). F. Cañas has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Cristiana Gassmann-Mayer, John M. Kane, L. Ford, Pilar Lim, Michelle Kramer, Mariëlle Eerdekens, Juan J López-Ibor, José R. Banegas, Jordi Casademont and C Varela. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, European Neuropsychopharmacology, International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Journal of Medical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact