F. Nabais

2.2k citations
30 papers · 343 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

F. Nabais

28 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

F. Nabais
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 168
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 122
  • Social Psychology 78
  • Computer Science Applications 18
  • Artificial Intelligence 77
Replace Jesse Leaman with:
Jesse Leaman United States
Hiroaki Sugiyama Japan
Dawei Yang China
Robert A. Walker United States
R. Cedazo Spain
X. Vilasis-Cardona Spain
Bram Bolder Germany
Enrico Calore Italy
Ewen Maclean Switzerland
Evgeny A. Stepanov Italy
F. Nabais relative to Jesse Leaman United States Jesse Leaman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jesse Leaman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Nabais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Nabais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Nabais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Nabais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Nabais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Nabais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Nabais. The network helps show where F. Nabais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Nabais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Nabais Line = papers co-authored together F. Nabais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201363
2 201358
3 200233
4 200531
5 201020
6 201517
7 201416
8 201312
9 201012
10 201811
11 20128
12 20158
13 20138
14 20187
15
EMOTE: Embodied-perceptive tutors for empathy-based learning in a game environment
20136
16 20146
17 20145
18 20145
19 20224
20
Internal kink mode stability in the presence of ICRH driven fast ions populations
20053

About F. Nabais

F. Nabais is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Materials Chemistry, Social Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 30 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (21 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (17 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (8 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (7 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (6 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (2 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (168 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (122 citations), Social Psychology (78 citations), Computer Science Applications (18 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (77 citations). F. Nabais has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Germany. Frequent co-authors include S. E. Sharapov, D. Borba, Ruth Aylett, Wolmet Barendregt, Arvid Kappas, S. D. Pinches, Ginevra Castellano, Ana Paiva, Eduardo Serrano‐Troncoso and Artur Arsénio. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Physics of Plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Frontiers in Physics and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact