E. Fable

6.5k citations
214 papers · 3.6k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

E. Fable

197 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

E. Fable
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 3.4k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.5k
  • Aerospace Engineering 978
  • Materials Chemistry 1.7k
  • Biomedical Engineering 843
Replace B. A. Grierson with:
B. A. Grierson United States
S. Coda Switzerland
M. Dunne Germany
M. A. Makowski United States
D. Gates United States
J. Snipes United States
S. Jachmich Germany
M. Lehnen Germany
V. S. Chan United States
A. C. C. Sips Germany
E. Fable relative to B. A. Grierson United States B. A. Grierson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
B. A. Grierson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Fable

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Fable's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Fable with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Fable more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Fable

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Fable. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Fable. The network helps show where E. Fable may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Fable, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Fable Line = papers co-authored together E. Fable links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 214 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013179
2 2009131
3 2014103
4 201296
5 200993
6 201993
7 201290
8 201385
9 201183
10 200980
11 201168
12 202167
13 201366
14 201458
15 201154
16 202052
17 200951
18 201350
19 202050
20
Validation of gyrokinetic modelling of impurity transport including rotation in ASDEX Upgrade
201345

About E. Fable

E. Fable is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 214 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (198 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (101 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (97 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (52 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (36 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (33 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (20 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (3.4k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.5k citations), Aerospace Engineering (978 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.7k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (843 citations). E. Fable has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include C. Angioni, R. Dux, R. M. McDermott, O. Sauter, G. Tardini, T. Pütterich, H. Zohm, M. Siccinio, F. Ryter and F. J. Casson. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Fusion Engineering and Design, Physics of Plasmas and Fusion Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact