F. E. Treloar

601 citations
21 papers · 495 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

F. E. Treloar

20 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

F. E. Treloar
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 154
  • Organic Chemistry 166
  • Spectroscopy 89
  • Bioengineering 29
  • Biophysics 24
Replace Ming‐Fea Chow with:
Ming‐Fea Chow United States
K. K. Rohatgi India
D. E. Bliss United States
Reuben B. Girling United Kingdom
F. Busi Italy
Richard R. Hautala United States
Th. Funck Germany
Donald W. Heseltine France
Philip J. Trotter United States
Karl Weiss United States
F. E. Treloar relative to Ming‐Fea Chow United States Ming‐Fea Chow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ming‐Fea Chow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. E. Treloar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. E. Treloar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. E. Treloar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. E. Treloar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. E. Treloar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. E. Treloar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. E. Treloar. The network helps show where F. E. Treloar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside F. E. Treloar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. E. Treloar Line = papers co-authored together F. E. Treloar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982154
2 197999
3 197845
4 198139
5 197422
6 197621
7 198220
8 196319
9 196512
10 197011
11 198010
12 196910
13 19766
14 19806
15 19605
16 19724
17 19614
18 19763
19 19612
20 19612

About F. E. Treloar

F. E. Treloar is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photopolymerization techniques and applications (4 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (4 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (4 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (154 citations), Organic Chemistry (166 citations), Spectroscopy (89 citations), Bioengineering (29 citations) and Biophysics (24 citations). F. E. Treloar has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include William H. Sawyer, Keith R. Thulborn, K.P. Ghiggino, Peter Thistlethwaite, Leann Tilley, K.L. Tan, R. J. Eldridge, Edward Blatt, Robert G. Gilbert and A. G. Maddock. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, Chemical Physics Letters, Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data and Archaeometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact