Ming‐Fea Chow

583 citations
22 papers · 505 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ming‐Fea Chow

22 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Ming‐Fea Chow
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 204
  • Organic Chemistry 221
  • Bioengineering 37
  • Spectroscopy 68
  • Biophysics 21
Replace F. E. Treloar with:
F. E. Treloar Australia
D. E. Bliss United States
Mary Mahaney Germany
Klaus Gustav Germany
Karl Weiss United States
A. T. Armstrong United States
Kankan Bhattacharyya India
H. Leonhardt Germany
Friedrich Dörr Germany
Philip J. Trotter United States
Ming‐Fea Chow relative to F. E. Treloar Australia F. E. Treloar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
F. E. Treloar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Fea Chow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Fea Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Fea Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Fea Chow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Fea Chow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Fea Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Fea Chow. The network helps show where Ming‐Fea Chow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Fea Chow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Fea Chow Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Fea Chow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197886
2 198050
3 197949
4 198035
5 198134
6 197729
7 198028
8 197925
9 198023
10 197823
11 198120
12 197819
13 198116
14 198114
15 198011
16 197711
17 198110
18 19789
19 19794
20 19773

About Ming‐Fea Chow

Ming‐Fea Chow is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electrochemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (8 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (3 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (3 papers), Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (204 citations), Organic Chemistry (221 citations), Bioengineering (37 citations), Spectroscopy (68 citations) and Biophysics (21 citations). Ming‐Fea Chow has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas J. Turro, J. RIGAUDY, Gregory C. Weed, Chen‐Ho Tung, Yoshifumi Tanimoto, Irene E. Kochevar, D. R. Anderson, Walter Klöpffer, Yoshikatsu Ito and N. J. TURRO. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Tetrahedron Letters, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Chemical Physics Letters and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact