F. E. S. Tan

12 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

F. E. S. Tan
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Family Practice 15
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 127
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 13
  • Pharmacy 14
Replace Zyad Taher Saleh with:
Zyad Taher Saleh Jordan
Mary D. Bondmass United States
Gregory M. Garrison United States
Dawn M. Klein United States
Roger D. Carpenter United States
Maria Liljeroos Sweden
Jacira dos Santos Oliveira Brazil
Insil Jang South Korea
Eva Drevenhorn Sweden
Mia Clark United States
F. E. S. Tan relative to Zyad Taher Saleh Jordan Zyad Taher Saleh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.7×
Zyad Taher Saleh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. E. S. Tan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. E. S. Tan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. E. S. Tan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. E. S. Tan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. E. S. Tan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. E. S. Tan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. E. S. Tan. The network helps show where F. E. S. Tan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. E. S. Tan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. E. S. Tan Line = papers co-authored together F. E. S. Tan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2000194
2 201247
3 201037
4 201533
5 201630
6 200714
7 20168
8 20165
9 20145
10 20194
11 20082
12 20102

About F. E. S. Tan

F. E. S. Tan is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Epidemiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimal Experimental Design Methods (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (2 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (1 paper), graph theory and CDMA systems (1 paper), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (15 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (127 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (13 citations) and Pharmacy (14 citations). F. E. S. Tan has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Taiwan and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Tiny Jaarsma, J.P.M. Diederiks, Ruud J.G. Halfens, H. Huijer Abu‐Saad, Kathleen Dracup, Jan P.H. Hamers, Daniëlle M. L. Verstegen, Stephen James O'Connor, Nynke de Jong and Hilde Verbeek. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Quality & Safety, International Psychogeriatrics, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Statistics in Medicine and BMC Geriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact