F Carnino

1.3k citations
38 papers · 908 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

F Carnino

35 papers receiving 863 citations

Peers

F Carnino
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Reproductive Medicine 351
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 92
  • Oncology 332
  • Cancer Research 98
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 142
Replace E. Sandberg with:
E. Sandberg Denmark
Hanne Havsteen Denmark
Donna Stock-Novack United States
Mary Cunningham United States
Awatif Al‐Nafussi United Kingdom
Anne‐Claire Hardy‐Bessard France
Roger B. Lee United States
Katarína Macháleková Slovakia
Rüdiger Klapdor Germany
Joyce Varughese United States
F Carnino relative to E. Sandberg Denmark E. Sandberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
E. Sandberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F Carnino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F Carnino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F Carnino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F Carnino more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F Carnino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F Carnino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F Carnino. The network helps show where F Carnino may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F Carnino, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F Carnino Line = papers co-authored together F Carnino links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996127
2 1989108
3 200096
4 199669
5 199766
6 200450
7 199149
8 199440
9 198739
10 199325
11 200424
12 200124
13 199723
14 200321
15
p53 status is neither a predictive nor a prognostic variable in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with a paclitaxel-based regimen.
200121
16 200019
17 200116
18 198910
19 199610
20 19969

About F Carnino

F Carnino is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (19 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (10 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (4 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (351 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (92 citations), Oncology (332 citations), Cancer Research (98 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (142 citations). F Carnino has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include PierFranco Conte, Angiolo Gadducci, Milena Bruzzone, Luigi Gallo, S. Chiara, I. Brunetti, R. Rosso, Massimo Aglietta, Antonella Romanini and F Gavosto. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer, Acta Oncologica and Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact