E. Sandberg

16 papers receiving 752 citations

Peers

E. Sandberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Reproductive Medicine 196
  • Otorhinolaryngology 84
  • Oncology 318
  • Cancer Research 150
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 61
Replace Eric J. Joosens with:
Eric J. Joosens Belgium
Louis Kayitalire France
Kazım Uygun Türkiye
Jacques Chauvergne France
Hanne Havsteen Denmark
M. R. Sertoli Italy
Ottorino Nascimben Italy
Dimosthenis-Vasilios Skarlos Greece
M. Van Eijkeren Belgium
Rossella De Cecio Italy
E. Sandberg relative to Eric J. Joosens Belgium Eric J. Joosens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Eric J. Joosens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Sandberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Sandberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Sandberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Sandberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Sandberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Sandberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Sandberg. The network helps show where E. Sandberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Sandberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Sandberg Line = papers co-authored together E. Sandberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1989187
2 1996144
3 1997126
4 1993122
5 200672
6 199369
7 199845
8 198214
9 198713
10 199011
11 19787
12 19957
13 19894
14 19972
15 19971
16 20241
17
The Danish Testicular Carcinoma Study. Results from recent clinical trials in non-seminomatous tumours.
19851
18 19860

About E. Sandberg

E. Sandberg is a scholar working on Oncology, Otorhinolaryngology, Cancer Research, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 826 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (7 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (2 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (2 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (2 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (196 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (84 citations), Oncology (318 citations), Cancer Research (150 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (61 citations). E. Sandberg has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anders Kristian Moeller Jakobsen, Per Pfeiffer, A. P. Andersen, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Jens Overgaard, Mogens Hjelm-Hansen, Hanne Sand Hansen, JØRN ERIK ANDERSEN, Kamma Bertelsen and May Gade Pedersen. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cancer, Acta Oncologica, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact