E.W. Rapport
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 12
-
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 3
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 3
- Co-authors
- Peter B. Møens (2 shared papers)Stephen S. Tobe (2 shared papers)R. H. Dadd (2 shared papers)David W. Stanley‐Samuelson (2 shared papers)Charles F. Sing (1 shared paper)David J. Rapport (1 shared paper)Jacques Berger (1 shared paper)Ian M. Rogers (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology (2 papers)Journal of Experimental Zoology (2 papers)Journal of Insect Physiology (1 paper)The Journal of Cell Biology (1 paper)Canadian Journal of Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
E.W. Rapport
17 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cell Biology 132
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 101
- Insect Science 70
- Molecular Biology 307
- Aquatic Science 28
Countries citing papers authored by E.W. Rapport
This map shows the geographic impact of E.W. Rapport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.W. Rapport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.W. Rapport more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.W. Rapport
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.W. Rapport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.W. Rapport. The network helps show where E.W. Rapport may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside E.W. Rapport, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1971 | 260 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 49 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 36 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1979 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1971 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1974 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1973 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1976 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1975 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1980 | 1 |
About E.W. Rapport
E.W. Rapport is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Aquatic Science, Insect Science and Cell Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (12 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (6 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (3 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (132 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (101 citations), Insect Science (70 citations), Molecular Biology (307 citations) and Aquatic Science (28 citations). E.W. Rapport has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter B. Møens, Stephen S. Tobe, R. H. Dadd, David W. Stanley‐Samuelson, Charles F. Sing, David J. Rapport, Jacques Berger and Ian M. Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, Journal of Experimental Zoology, Journal of Insect Physiology, The Journal of Cell Biology and Canadian Journal of Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.