Eva Hofmann
Impact in
- Marketing top 1%
- Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Accounting top 2%
- Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Papers in
-
- Taxation and Compliance Studies 21
-
- Digital Marketing and Social Media 8
- Digital Economy and Work Transformation 5
- Co-authors
- Erich Kirchler (30 shared papers)Barbara Hartl (22 shared papers)Katharina Gangl (18 shared papers)Elfriede Penz (12 shared papers)Erik Hoelzl (4 shared papers)Martina Hartner‐Tiefenthaler (2 shared papers)Benno Torgler (1 shared paper)Martin Voracek (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Economic Psychology (4 papers)Sustainability (4 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (3 papers)Journal of Cleaner Production (3 papers)Journal of Business Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Eva Hofmann
50 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Marketing 583
- Accounting 521
- Economics and Econometrics 792
- General Decision Sciences 43
- Safety Research 188
Countries citing papers authored by Eva Hofmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Hofmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Hofmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Hofmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Hofmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Hofmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Hofmann. The network helps show where Eva Hofmann may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Hofmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 157 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 107 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 104 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 91 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 90 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 79 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 74 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 73 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 62 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 57 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 49 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 33 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 29 |
About Eva Hofmann
Eva Hofmann is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Safety Research and Accounting, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Taxation and Compliance Studies (21 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (16 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (12 papers), Sharing Economy and Platforms (12 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (8 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (6 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers) and Digital Economy and Work Transformation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (583 citations), Accounting (521 citations), Economics and Econometrics (792 citations), General Decision Sciences (43 citations) and Safety Research (188 citations). Eva Hofmann has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Erich Kirchler, Barbara Hartl, Katharina Gangl, Elfriede Penz, Erik Hoelzl, Martina Hartner‐Tiefenthaler, Benno Torgler, Martin Voracek, Stephan Muehlbacher and Gerrit Antonides. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Psychology, Sustainability, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Cleaner Production and Journal of Business Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.