Eva Hesselmark

943 citations
22 papers · 638 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Hesselmark

22 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

Eva Hesselmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Clinical Psychology 403
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 163
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 91
  • Neurology 82
Replace Pablo Luis López with:
Pablo Luis López Argentina
Martin Cederlöf Sweden
John J. Randolph United States
Maija Lindgren Finland
Emma Maria Frans Sweden
Gerald T. Voelbel United States
Wenhong Cheng China
Anne Scherer Germany
Volkan Topçuoğlu Türkiye
Mark‐Peter Steenhuis Netherlands
Eva Hesselmark relative to Pablo Luis López Argentina Pablo Luis López's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Pablo Luis López · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Hesselmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Hesselmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Hesselmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Hesselmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Hesselmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Hesselmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Hesselmark. The network helps show where Eva Hesselmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Hesselmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Hesselmark Line = papers co-authored together Eva Hesselmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201899
2 201393
3 201787
4 202076
5 201855
6 201747
7 202027
8 201426
9 202126
10 202024
11 201920
12 201914
13 201911
14 20219
15 20199
16 20194
17 20203
18 20213
19 20242
20 20191

About Eva Hesselmark

Eva Hesselmark is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (12 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (403 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (163 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations) and Neurology (82 citations). Eva Hesselmark has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Susanne Bejerot, Stephanie M. Plenty, David Mataix-Cols, Lorena Fernández de la Cruz, Henrik Larsson, Kayoko Isomura, Ralf Kuja‐Halkola, Ana Pérez-Vigil, Gustaf Brander and Brian Matthew D'Onofrio. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA Psychiatry, Translational Psychiatry, Brain Behavior and Immunity, BMC Psychiatry and Acta Paediatrica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact