Eva Biringer

1.6k citations
65 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Biringer

60 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Eva Biringer
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Clinical Psychology 226
  • Pharmacy 47
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 133
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
Replace J. Kim Penberthy with:
J. Kim Penberthy United States
Kathryn Graff Low United States
Joshua A. Rash Canada
Shahrzad Mavandadi United States
Clemente Cedro Italy
María Elena Medina Mora Mexico
Kelsey T. Laird United States
Shirley Thomas United Kingdom
Mark Snowden United States
Dana L. Rofey United States
Eva Biringer relative to J. Kim Penberthy United States J. Kim Penberthy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
J. Kim Penberthy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Biringer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Biringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Biringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Biringer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Biringer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Biringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Biringer. The network helps show where Eva Biringer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Biringer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Biringer Line = papers co-authored together Eva Biringer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005115
2 201784
3 201381
4 200577
5 200771
6 201059
7 200958
8 201157
9 201145
10 200941
11 201240
12 201531
13 201830
14 201624
15 200521
16 201020
17 201720
18 201518
19 201418
20 201616

About Eva Biringer

Eva Biringer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Pharmacology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (7 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (5 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (4 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (226 citations), Pharmacy (47 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (133 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations). Eva Biringer has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arnstein Mykletun, Anders Lund, Tone Tangen, Miriam Hartveit, Oddbjørn Hove, Marit Borg, Kirsten I. Stordal, Torleif Ruud, Turid Helland and Wenche Andersen Helland. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, European Psychiatry, BMC Psychiatry, The journal of nutrition health & aging and Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact