Mark Snowden

2.6k citations
55 papers · 1.9k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Snowden

55 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Mark Snowden
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 56
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 435
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 81
  • Health 115
  • Clinical Psychology 304
Replace David Conn with:
David Conn Canada
Janine Stein Germany
Christian Brettschneider Germany
Vasiliki Orgeta United Kingdom
Sabrina Paterniti France
Johannes Wancata Austria
L. Jaime Fitten United States
Benjamin T. Mast United States
Rob H. S. van den Brink Netherlands
Pedro Saz Spain
Mark Snowden relative to David Conn Canada David Conn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David Conn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Snowden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Snowden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Snowden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Snowden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Snowden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Snowden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Snowden. The network helps show where Mark Snowden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Snowden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Snowden Line = papers co-authored together Mark Snowden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011182
2 2010165
3 1999147
4 2003138
5 201995
6 201492
7 200588
8 200781
9 200366
10 201763
11 200762
12 200061
13 199847
14 201646
15 200643
16
Treating depression in older adults: challenges to implementing the recommendations of an expert panel.
200840
17 201532
18 201227
19 202025
20 199525

About Mark Snowden

Mark Snowden is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (56 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (435 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (81 citations), Health (115 citations) and Clinical Psychology (304 citations). Mark Snowden has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Roy‐Byrne, Lesley Steinman, Debra Srebnik, Joan Russo, Jun Ma, Nan Lv, Lynda A. Anderson, Thomas Prohaska, Barbara Williams and Katherine Anne Comtois. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Frontiers in Public Health, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact