Eva Bei

14 papers receiving 190 citations

Eva Bei's Hit Papers

Cultural and societal motivations for being informal caregivers: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis 2022 · 80 citations
800+1+2Years since publication255075

Peers

Eva Bei
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Health 12
  • Sociology and Political Science 71
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 21
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 2
  • Clinical Psychology 23
Replace Mikołaj Zarzycki with:
Mikołaj Zarzycki United Kingdom
Danae Rodríguez Gatta United Kingdom
Jillian V Glazer United States
Emily D. Hooker United States
Sinéad M. Hynes Ireland
Fátima Corrêa Oliver Brazil
Zhaoya Fan China
Hélio Manhica Sweden
El Hadj Touré Canada
Milena von Kutzleben Germany
Eva Bei relative to Mikołaj Zarzycki United Kingdom Mikołaj Zarzycki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Mikołaj Zarzycki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Bei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Bei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Bei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Bei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Bei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Bei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Bei. The network helps show where Eva Bei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Bei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Bei Line = papers co-authored together Eva Bei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Cultural and societal motivations for being informal caregivers: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis
Hit paper breakdown →
202280
2 202232
3 202013
4 202312
5 202212
6 20219
7 20239
8 20247
9 20224
10 20234
11 20243
12 20243
13 20252
14 20252
15 20260

About Eva Bei

Eva Bei is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (8 papers), Family Support in Illness (5 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (1 paper), Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper) and Humor Studies and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (12 citations), Sociology and Political Science (71 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (21 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (2 citations) and Clinical Psychology (23 citations). Eva Bei has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mikołaj Zarzycki, Val Morrison, Diane Seddon, Noa Vilchinsky, Orit Rotem-Mindali, Val L Morrison, Chiara Pecini, Mariët Hagedoorn, Robbert Sanderman and Viola Angelini. Their work appears in journals such as Health Psychology Review, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychology, BMJ Open and Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact