Emily D. Hooker

404 citations
13 papers · 123 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Health disparities and outcomes 3
    • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 2
    • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 1
    • Cultural Differences and Values 1

Emily D. Hooker

11 papers receiving 120 citations

Peers

Emily D. Hooker
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Applied Psychology 12
  • Health 17
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 7
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 2
  • Social Psychology 25
Replace Julie Arsandaux with:
Julie Arsandaux France
Orly Idan Israel
Izabella Zandberg United States
Roxanna Morote Norway
Kamila Rachubińska Poland
Martine Vallarino Italy
Ekaterina Pronizius Austria
Yang Eun Kim South Korea
Parisa Parsafar United States
Karmpaul Singh United Kingdom
Emily D. Hooker relative to Julie Arsandaux France Julie Arsandaux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Julie Arsandaux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily D. Hooker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily D. Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily D. Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily D. Hooker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily D. Hooker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily D. Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily D. Hooker. The network helps show where Emily D. Hooker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Emily D. Hooker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily D. Hooker Line = papers co-authored together Emily D. Hooker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201844
2 201922
3 201719
4 202012
5 20226
6 20186
7 20235
8 20214
9 20223
10 20231
11
Does Socioeconomic Status Moderate the Link Between Daily, Received Social Support and Daily Psychological and Physiological Outcomes?
20171
12 20240
13 20240

About Emily D. Hooker

Emily D. Hooker is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Behavioral Neuroscience and Speech and Hearing, having authored 13 papers that have together received 123 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper) and Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (12 citations), Health (17 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (7 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (2 citations) and Social Psychology (25 citations). Emily D. Hooker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Sarah D. Pressman, Belinda Campos, John F. Hunter, Nicolas Rohleder, Sally S. Dickerson, Peggy M. Zoccola, Scott C. Roesch, Patricia González, Krista M. Perreira and Lesa Hoffman. Their work appears in journals such as Psychosomatic Medicine, Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, Pediatric Surgery International, Computers in Human Behavior and Disability and health journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact