Ester Amado

21 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Ester Amado
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Family Practice 42
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 56
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 17
  • General Health Professions 35
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 24
Replace Inês Teixeira with:
Inês Teixeira Portugal
Hyun Soon Sohn South Korea
Elida Zairina Indonesia
R.P. Sequeira Bahrain
Hongxuan Xu China
Roland Rapold Switzerland
Shakti Shrestha Nepal
Arun V. Mohan United States
Jessye X. Cohen United States
Eric C. T. Geijteman Netherlands
Ester Amado relative to Inês Teixeira Portugal Inês Teixeira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Inês Teixeira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ester Amado

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ester Amado's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ester Amado with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ester Amado more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ester Amado

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ester Amado. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ester Amado. The network helps show where Ester Amado may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ester Amado, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ester Amado Line = papers co-authored together Ester Amado links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201161
2 201154
3 202030
4 200429
5 202322
6 202016
7 202114
8 200011
9 200911
10 201710
11 20149
12 20159
13 20227
14 20136
15 20085
16
[Analysis of prescriptions in primary care: evaluation of a system of indicators].
19974
17
[Is the profile of antihypertensive drug utilization justified?].
19973
18
Prescripció farmacèutica segura (PREFASEG)
20113
19 20133
20 20183

About Ester Amado

Ester Amado is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (11 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (2 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (42 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (56 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (17 citations), General Health Professions (35 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (24 citations). Ester Amado has collaborated with scholars based in Spain. Frequent co-authors include Enriqueta Pujol Ribera, Valeria Pacheco‐Huergo, Josep Maria Borràs, José Luis del Val García, Carme Viladrich, Concepción Violán, Carmen Cabezas, Esther Núñez, Sergio Fernández‐Bertolín and Albert Roso‐Llorach. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes Care, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics, Medical Care and BMC Geriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact