Ester Amado

23 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Ester Amado
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Family Practice 35
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 47
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 13
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Toxicology 7
Replace Theo P. G. M. de Vries with:
Theo P. G. M. de Vries Netherlands
Adliah Mhd Ali Malaysia
Myriam Jaam Qatar
Lucía Franco-Trigo Australia
Dhfer Alshayban Saudi Arabia
Lea Botermann Germany
Eva Drewelow Germany
Samuel Allemann Switzerland
Leslie Phillips United States
Nathan O. Spell United States
Ester Amado relative to Theo P. G. M. de Vries Netherlands Theo P. G. M. de Vries's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Theo P. G. M. de Vries · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ester Amado

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ester Amado's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ester Amado with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ester Amado more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ester Amado

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ester Amado. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ester Amado. The network helps show where Ester Amado may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ester Amado, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ester Amado Line = papers co-authored together Ester Amado links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201158
2 201154
3 200429
4 202027
5 202319
6 202016
7 202112
8 200910
9 200010
10 201710
11 201510
12 19869
13 20227
14 20147
15 20136
16 20085
17
[Is the profile of antihypertensive drug utilization justified?].
19974
18
[Analysis of prescriptions in primary care: evaluation of a system of indicators].
19974
19
Prescripció farmacèutica segura (PREFASEG)
20113
20 20133

About Ester Amado

Ester Amado is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Family Practice, having authored 23 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (35 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (47 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (13 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and Toxicology (7 citations). Ester Amado has collaborated with scholars based in Spain. Frequent co-authors include Enriqueta Pujol‐Ribera, Josep M. Borràs, Pérez Rodríguez, Albert Roso‐Llorach, Sergio Fernández‐Bertolín, Concepción Violán, José Luis del Val García, Valeria Pacheco‐Huergo, Carme Viladrich and Montserrat Núñez. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Geriatrics, Journal of Clinical Medicine, BMC Public Health, Diabetes Care and Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact