Erik Weber

64 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Erik Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • History and Philosophy of Science 248
  • Philosophy 104
  • Theoretical Computer Science 8
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 47
Replace David J. Stump with:
David J. Stump United States
Darrell P. Rowbottom United Kingdom
Hans Radder Netherlands
Jim Woodward United States
William Warren Bartley United States
Matti Sintonen Finland
C. A. Hooker Australia
Friedrich Steinle Germany
J. D. Trout United States
Victor Gijsbers Netherlands
Erik Weber relative to David J. Stump United States David J. Stump's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
David J. Stump · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erik Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Weber. The network helps show where Erik Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Erik Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erik Weber Line = papers co-authored together Erik Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201362
2 200235
3 201024
4 201124
5 200223
6 200819
7 200317
8 202116
9 200915
10 200715
11
Dispositional Explanations of Behavior
200214
12
Explanatory Proofs in Mathematics
200213
13 201011
14 201111
15 201410
16 199910
17 20169
18 20149
19
Can we dispense with the structural explanation of social facts?
20008
20 20028

About Erik Weber

Erik Weber is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 75 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (43 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (6 papers), Science and Climate Studies (5 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Design Education and Practice (3 papers) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (248 citations), Philosophy (104 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (8 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (47 citations). Erik Weber has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeroen Van Bouwel, Leen De Vreese, Dunja Šešelja, B Leuridan, Stuart Glennan, Phyllis Illari, Steffen Ducheyne, Joke Meheus, Rogier De Langhe and Pieter E. Vermaas. Their work appears in journals such as Foundations of Science, Logique et analyse/Logique et analyse. Nouvelle série, Synthese, Logic and Logical Philosophy and Journal for General Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact