C. A. Hooker

38 papers receiving 881 citations

Peers

C. A. Hooker
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • History and Philosophy of Science 515
  • Philosophy 204
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 217
  • General Decision Sciences 31
  • General Psychology 15
Replace Jim Woodward with:
Jim Woodward United States
C. A. Hooker Canada
Risto Hilpinen Finland
Phil Dowe Australia
Michael Strevens United States
Paul Oppenheim United States
Stuart Glennan United States
Peter Menzies Australia
Stephen Leeds United States
Grover Maxwell United States
C. A. Hooker relative to Jim Woodward United States Jim Woodward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jim Woodward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. A. Hooker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. A. Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. A. Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. A. Hooker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. A. Hooker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. A. Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. A. Hooker. The network helps show where C. A. Hooker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside C. A. Hooker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. A. Hooker Line = papers co-authored together C. A. Hooker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976197
2 1989127
3 1985121
4 2000101
5
199994
6 199289
7 200448
8 200135
9 197433
10 197832
11 198128
12 197527
13 199924
14 199423
15 199120
16 197114
17 199913
18 200813
19 196812
20 198112

About C. A. Hooker

C. A. Hooker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Sociology and Political Science and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (16 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (3 papers) and Biofield Effects and Biophysics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (515 citations), Philosophy (204 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (217 citations), General Decision Sciences (31 citations) and General Psychology (15 citations). C. A. Hooker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include William Harper, Paul M. Churchland, Wayne Christensen, John F. Post, John Collier, Edward F. McClennen, David Stove, Robert MacDonald, Robert van Hulst and David Crossley. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science, Synthese and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact