Ena Gupta
Impact in
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Papers in
-
- Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques 3
- Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits 2
- Food composition and properties 2
- Co-authors
- Shanthy Sundaram (4 shared papers)Shalini Purwar (3 shared papers)Ramesh Sharma (1 shared paper)Shweta Kaushik (1 shared paper)Anil K. Balapure (1 shared paper)G. Rai (1 shared paper)Neha Mishra (7 shared papers)Karishma Gupta (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE (1 paper)Pharmacognosy Magazine (1 paper)Current Nutrition & Food Science (5 papers)Journal of Food Quality (1 paper)Czech Journal of Food Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesIran
In The Last Decade
Ena Gupta
18 papers receiving 255 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Nutrition and Dietetics 163
- Biochemistry 42
- Sensory Systems 23
- Food Science 70
- Plant Science 59
Countries citing papers authored by Ena Gupta
This map shows the geographic impact of Ena Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ena Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ena Gupta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ena Gupta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ena Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ena Gupta. The network helps show where Ena Gupta may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ena Gupta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 119 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 15 | Low cost preservation of cauliflower for 180 days through hurdle technology | 2013 | 1 |
| 16 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 0 |
About Ena Gupta
Ena Gupta is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Plant Science and Biochemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (2 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (2 papers), Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits (2 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (2 papers) and Food composition and properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (163 citations), Biochemistry (42 citations), Sensory Systems (23 citations), Food Science (70 citations) and Plant Science (59 citations). Ena Gupta has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Shanthy Sundaram, Shalini Purwar, Ramesh Sharma, Shweta Kaushik, Anil K. Balapure, G. Rai, Neha Mishra, Karishma Gupta, Pragya Mishra and Johra Khan. Their work appears in journals such as REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE, Pharmacognosy Magazine, Current Nutrition & Food Science, Journal of Food Quality and Czech Journal of Food Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.