Emma Shaw
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 2
-
- Insect and Pesticide Research 2
- Mollusks and Parasites Studies 2
- Co-authors
- James R. Bell (2 shared papers)Gabriel S. Weyman (1 shared paper)David A. Bohan (1 shared paper)A. Mark Langan (3 shared papers)Ann L. Rypstra (1 shared paper)Adeeba Dark (1 shared paper)C. Philip Wheater (2 shared papers)Renato Colaço (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Heredity (2 papers)Poultry Science (1 paper)Applied Soil Ecology (1 paper)Pest Management Science (1 paper)PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Emma Shaw
13 papers receiving 775 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Insect Science 224
- Ecological Modeling 65
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 219
- Genetics 236
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 100
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Shaw. The network helps show where Emma Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 387 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 136 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 109 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 90 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 29 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 12 | Molecular identification of interaction pathways between carabid beetles and slugs in alfalfa. | 2011 | 1 |
| 13 | Slugs from the Nearctic: what we need to learn from the Western Palearctic. | 2011 | 1 |
About Emma Shaw
Emma Shaw is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 818 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers), Mollusks and Parasites Studies (2 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (2 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (1 paper), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (1 paper) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (224 citations), Ecological Modeling (65 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (219 citations), Genetics (236 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (100 citations). Emma Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include James R. Bell, Gabriel S. Weyman, David A. Bohan, A. Mark Langan, Ann L. Rypstra, Adeeba Dark, C. Philip Wheater, Renato Colaço, Stéphanie M. Swarbreck and Zhonglin Shang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Heredity, Poultry Science, Applied Soil Ecology, Pest Management Science and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.