Countries where authors publish in Applied Soil Ecology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Soil Ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Soil Ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Soil Ecology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Applied Soil Ecology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Soil Ecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Soil Ecology.
About Applied Soil Ecology
The 5.9k papers published in Applied Soil Ecology in the last decades have received a total of 213.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Applied Soil Ecology usually cover Soil Science (2.8k papers), Ecology (1.8k papers), Plant Science (2.6k papers), Pollution (749 papers) and Environmental Chemistry (644 papers) specifically the topics of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2.7k papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (952 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (910 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (705 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (658 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (521 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (459 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (436 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Soil Ecology are Tom Bongers, H. Ferris, Michael R. Zeiss, John W. Doran, R.G.M. de Goede, Marina Bongers, A.H.C. van Bruggen, D. Egamberdiyeva, L. Brussaard and Yuji Oka.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.