Matthew T. Rutter

1.3k citations
26 papers · 914 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew T. Rutter

25 papers receiving 896 citations

Peers

Matthew T. Rutter
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 541
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 197
  • Genetics 395
  • Insect Science 134
  • Plant Science 387
Replace Anne C. Worley with:
Anne C. Worley Canada
Alexandru Lucian Curtu Romania
Jennifer L. Ison United States
Dorset W. Trapnell United States
Matthew H. Koski United States
H. L. Billington United Kingdom
Andrea L. Case United States
Shu‐Mei Chang United States
Heather F. Sahli United States
Jennifer C. Geib United States
Matthew T. Rutter relative to Anne C. Worley Canada Anne C. Worley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Anne C. Worley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew T. Rutter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew T. Rutter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew T. Rutter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew T. Rutter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew T. Rutter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew T. Rutter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew T. Rutter. The network helps show where Matthew T. Rutter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew T. Rutter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew T. Rutter Line = papers co-authored together Matthew T. Rutter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002197
2 1998149
3 200589
4 201882
5 200481
6 200749
7 200942
8 201236
9 201230
10 201325
11 201720
12 201620
13 201815
14 201913
15 200411
16 201510
17 20199
18 20129
19 20209
20 20045

About Matthew T. Rutter

Matthew T. Rutter is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 26 papers that have together received 914 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (9 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (541 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (197 citations), Genetics (395 citations), Insect Science (134 citations) and Plant Science (387 citations). Matthew T. Rutter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Charles B. Fenster, Mark D. Rausher, Anurag A. Agrawal, Peter Tiffin, John R. Stinchcombe, Rodney Mauricio, Donald S. Burdick, Susan R. Kephart, Frank H. Shaw and Richard J. Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, Genetics, Evolutionary Ecology, PLoS ONE and Annals of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact