Emma Patchick
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Treatment
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Papers in
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 6
-
- Pain Management and Treatment 4
- Co-authors
- Craig Murray (4 shared papers)Toby Howard (4 shared papers)Fabrice Caillette (4 shared papers)Audrey Bowen (6 shared papers)Andy Vail (5 shared papers)Anne Hesketh (4 shared papers)Jai Kulkarni (2 shared papers)Pippa Tyrrell (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Rehabilitation (2 papers)Disability and Rehabilitation (1 paper)Health Technology Assessment (1 paper)International Journal on Disability and Human Development (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emma Patchick
11 papers receiving 449 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 120
- Rehabilitation 113
- Human-Computer Interaction 33
- Cognitive Neuroscience 110
- Pharmacology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Patchick
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Patchick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Patchick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Patchick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Patchick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Patchick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Patchick. The network helps show where Emma Patchick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Emma Patchick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 109 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 10 | Attention control within the ACTNoW randomized controlled trial:: getting it right? | 2010 | 1 |
| 11 | Enhanced aphasia or dysarthria therapy delivered in the first four months after stroke does not add more benefit than attention control: a randomised controlled trial | 2012 | 1 |
About Emma Patchick
Emma Patchick is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 11 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects (1 paper), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (1 paper), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (120 citations), Rehabilitation (113 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (33 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations) and Pharmacology (71 citations). Emma Patchick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Craig Murray, Toby Howard, Fabrice Caillette, Audrey Bowen, Andy Vail, Anne Hesketh, Jai Kulkarni, Pippa Tyrrell, Linda Davies and Caroline Watkins. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Rehabilitation, Disability and Rehabilitation, Health Technology Assessment, International Journal on Disability and Human Development and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.