Emma James

432 citations
16 papers · 258 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Emma James

14 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

Emma James
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 144
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 114
  • Statistics and Probability 29
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 45
  • Education 32
Replace Erica M. Ellis with:
Erica M. Ellis United States
Jon‐Fan Hu Taiwan
Maayan Stavans United States
Francesco Poli Netherlands
Brianna T. M. McMillan United States
Eleonore Huguette M. Smalle Belgium
Emily Mather United Kingdom
Karli M. Nave United States
Su-hua Wang United States
Catalina Suárez-Rivera United States
Emma James relative to Erica M. Ellis United States Erica M. Ellis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Erica M. Ellis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma James. The network helps show where Emma James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Emma James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma James Line = papers co-authored together Emma James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201764
2 202050
3 201827
4 202321
5 202017
6 202315
7 201714
8 202013
9 202112
10 20218
11 20236
12 20214
13 20244
14 20223
15 20250
16 20250

About Emma James

Emma James is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 16 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (144 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (114 citations), Statistics and Probability (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (45 citations) and Education (32 citations). Emma James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Lisa-Marie Henderson, M. Gareth Gaskell, Anna Weighall, Shelly Xiuli Tong, Kate Cain, Cade McCall, Aidan J. Horner, Scott A. Cairney, Nicholas J. Balfour and Hasan Al Toufailia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Developmental Science, Journal of Research in Reading, Animal Behaviour and Journal of Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact