Emma Doherty

37 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers

Emma Doherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 43
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 84
  • Small Animals 32
  • General Health Professions 68
  • Global and Planetary Change 52
Replace Kate Doyle with:
Kate Doyle United States
Bianca Carducci Canada
Melissa C. Daniels United States
Hammed Oladeji Mogaji Nigeria
Isabel Madzorera United States
Boungnong Boupha Laos
Warren M. Wilson Canada
Sophie Attwood United Kingdom
Temesgen Tilahun Ethiopia
Jennifer Wesson United States
Emma Doherty relative to Kate Doyle United States Kate Doyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Kate Doyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Doherty. The network helps show where Emma Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Doherty Line = papers co-authored together Emma Doherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201157
2 201847
3 201935
4 202234
5 201325
6 202122
7 201619
8 201918
9 201617
10 202315
11 202314
12 202212
13 201911
14 202210
15 20229
16 20197
17 20115
18 20224
19 20214
20 20243

About Emma Doherty

Emma Doherty is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Speech and Hearing, having authored 42 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (10 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (2 papers), Forest Management and Policy (1 paper) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (43 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (84 citations), Small Animals (32 citations), General Health Professions (68 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (52 citations). Emma Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Heike Schroeder, John Wiggers, Luke Wolfenden, Melanie Kingsland, Richard Wall, Siân Mitchell, Stewart T. G. Burgess, Belinda Tully, Elizabeth Elliott and Adrian Dunlop. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Drug and Alcohol Review, BMC Health Services Research, Systematic Reviews and Implementation Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact