Emma Doherty

634 citations
41 papers · 319 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Doherty

35 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

Emma Doherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 69
  • General Health Professions 172
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 88
  • Small Animals 28
  • Health 23
Replace Krishnapillai Vijayakumar with:
Krishnapillai Vijayakumar India
Brittany Blouin Canada
Kassahun Habtamu Ethiopia
Betty Anne Johnson United States
Mubashir Angolkar India
Cate Wallace Australia
Hugo Martínez‐Rojano Mexico
Anna Lamberti Italy
Elin Johansson Sweden
Ashok M Mehendale India
Emma Doherty relative to Krishnapillai Vijayakumar India Krishnapillai Vijayakumar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Krishnapillai Vijayakumar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Doherty. The network helps show where Emma Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Doherty Line = papers co-authored together Emma Doherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201843
2 201934
3 202229
4 201325
5 202121
6 201619
7 201617
8 201917
9 202314
10 202314
11 201911
12 202210
13 202210
14 20228
15 20196
16 20115
17 20203
18 20243
19 20223
20 20223

About Emma Doherty

Emma Doherty is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (14 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (11 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (11 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (6 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (69 citations), General Health Professions (172 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (88 citations), Small Animals (28 citations) and Health (23 citations). Emma Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include John Wiggers, Luke Wolfenden, Melanie Kingsland, Stewart T. G. Burgess, Siân Mitchell, Richard Wall, Elizabeth Elliott, Adrian Dunlop, Megan Freund and Jenny Bowman. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, BMC Health Services Research, Systematic Reviews, Drug and Alcohol Review and Implementation Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact