Emma Pollock

25 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Emma Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 222
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 53
  • Applied Psychology 47
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 238
  • Physiology 158
Replace Tara Finn with:
Tara Finn Australia
B W Martin Switzerland
D. Dewar Australia
Milena Morano Italy
Vincent Ebenegger Switzerland
Glen G. Gilbert United States
Avril Williamson United Kingdom
Dwan Bridges United States
Jennifer E. Reyes Alcaraz United States
M. Aarnio Finland
Emma Pollock relative to Tara Finn Australia Tara Finn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Tara Finn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Pollock. The network helps show where Emma Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Emma Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201893
2 201572
3 201758
4 201654
5 201634
6 201828
7 201926
8 201921
9 202021
10 202220
11 202112
12 202112
13 202110
14 201410
15 202110
16 20207
17 20157
18 20223
19 20243
20 20183

About Emma Pollock

Emma Pollock is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (16 papers), Physical Activity and Health (12 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (9 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (222 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (53 citations), Applied Psychology (47 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (238 citations) and Physiology (158 citations). Emma Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Philip J. Morgan, Narelle Eather, David R. Lubans, Myles D. Young, Alyce T Barnes, Ronald C. Plotnikoff, Sarah G. Kennedy, Chris Lonsdale, Jordan Smith and Dennis R. Taaffe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of science and medicine in sport, Journal of Child and Family Studies, Translational Behavioral Medicine, Annals of Behavioral Medicine and International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact