Emma Cave

859 citations
49 papers · 338 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Cave

44 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Emma Cave
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Pharmacy 32
  • General Health Professions 157
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 116
  • Modeling and Simulation 24
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 108
Replace Nanette Elster with:
Nanette Elster United States
Settimio Monteverde Switzerland
Seema Mohapatra United States
Hridaya Raj Devkota United Kingdom
Aamir Jafarey Pakistan
Paula de Souza Silva Freitas Brazil
Michelle Queally Ireland
Dázon Dixon Diallo United States
R J Harris India
Russell F. McCord United States
Emma Cave relative to Nanette Elster United States Nanette Elster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Nanette Elster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Cave

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Cave's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Cave with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Cave more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Cave

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Cave. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Cave. The network helps show where Emma Cave may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Emma Cave, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Cave Line = papers co-authored together Emma Cave links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202051
2 201330
3 200227
4 201716
5 201614
6 200314
7 201914
8 202112
9 201712
10 201011
11 202210
12 201610
13 20129
14 20189
15 20218
16 20177
17 20217
18 20097
19 20206
20 20235

About Emma Cave

Emma Cave is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 49 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (33 papers), Ethics in medical practice (17 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (13 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (10 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (8 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (8 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (32 citations), General Health Professions (157 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (116 citations), Modeling and Simulation (24 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (108 citations). Emma Cave has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Søren Holm, David Archard, Joe Brierley, Craig Purshouse, Jacinta Tan, Rob Heywood, Margaret Brazier, José Miola, Colin G. Nichols and Simon Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Law Review, Journal of Medical Ethics, Clinical Ethics, Modern Law Review and Health Care Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact