Emma Cave
Impact in
-
- Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Modeling and Simulation top 10%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
-
- Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare 33
-
- Ethics in medical practice 17
- Child and Adolescent Health 10
- Co-authors
- S. Holm (2 shared papers)David William Archard (6 shared papers)Joe Brierley (6 shared papers)Jacinta O. A. Tan (4 shared papers)Craig Purshouse (4 shared papers)Margaret Brazier (9 shared papers)Rob Heywood (8 shared papers)Colin G. Nichols (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Medical Law Review (10 papers)Journal of Medical Ethics (5 papers)BMJ (3 papers)Clinical Ethics (3 papers)Modern Law Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Emma Cave
48 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 102
- Modeling and Simulation 26
- Pharmacy 23
- General Health Professions 121
- Clinical Psychology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Cave
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Cave's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Cave with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Cave more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Cave
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Cave. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Cave. The network helps show where Emma Cave may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Emma Cave, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 56 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 6 |
About Emma Cave
Emma Cave is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (33 papers), Ethics in medical practice (17 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (13 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (10 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (10 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (8 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (102 citations), Modeling and Simulation (26 citations), Pharmacy (23 citations), General Health Professions (121 citations) and Clinical Psychology (71 citations). Emma Cave has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include S. Holm, David William Archard, Joe Brierley, Jacinta O. A. Tan, Craig Purshouse, Margaret Brazier, Rob Heywood, Colin G. Nichols, José Miola and Simon Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Law Review, Journal of Medical Ethics, BMJ, Clinical Ethics and Modern Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.