Clinical Ethics

555 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 555 papers published in Clinical Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Ethics usually cover General Health Professions (338 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (307 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (179 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in medical practice (259 papers), Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Medical Decision-Making (164 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (125 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Ethics are Lynn Gillam, Paquita de Zulueta, Anne‐Marie Slowther, Bert Molewijk, Barbara Prainsack, Helen Busby, Rei­dun Før­de, Stella Reiter-Theil, Priscilla Alderson and Gert Helgesson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Ethics.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Ethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025