Emma Borg

1.4k citations
42 papers · 470 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Borg

35 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers

Emma Borg
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 263
  • Language and Linguistics 193
  • Philosophy 195
  • History and Philosophy of Science 30
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 103
Replace Mitchell S. Green with:
Mitchell S. Green United States
Anne Bezuidenhout United States
Emar Maier Netherlands
Stephen Neale United States
Jane Heal United Kingdom
Stefano Predelli United Kingdom
Gregory McCulloch United Kingdom
Timothy Sundell United States
Manuel García‐Carpintero Spain
Valentine Hacquard United States
Emma Borg relative to Mitchell S. Green United States Mitchell S. Green's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Mitchell S. Green · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Borg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Borg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Borg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Borg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Borg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Borg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Borg. The network helps show where Emma Borg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Emma Borg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Borg Line = papers co-authored together Emma Borg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004135
2 201263
3
If mirror neurons are the answer, what was the question?
200736
4 201728
5 200027
6 201925
7 200222
8 201616
9 200911
10 201711
11 20138
12 20198
13 20187
14 20226
15 20216
16 20235
17 20125
18 20015
19 20165
20
Meaning and context: a survey of a contemporary debate
20095

About Emma Borg

Emma Borg is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (263 citations), Language and Linguistics (193 citations), Philosophy (195 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (103 citations). Emma Borg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tim V. Salomons, Richard Harrison, Brad Hooker, Nat Hansen, Paul Horwich, Andrew Lloyd, Katie Breheny, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Maxime Lepoutre and Paul Noordhof. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Mind & Language, Journal of Consciousness Studies, Inquiry and Review of Philosophy and Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact