Stephen Neale
Impact in
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 12
- Philosophy 12
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 4
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
- Co-authors
- Peter Ludlow (1 shared paper)David F. Austin (1 shared paper)Stephen Schiffer (1 shared paper)Michael Morris (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Screen (5 papers)Linguistics and Philosophy (3 papers)Philosophical Perspectives (2 papers)Mind & Language (1 paper)Philosophical Issues (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Stephen Neale
30 papers receiving 660 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Language and Linguistics 422
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 473
- Philosophy 309
- History and Philosophy of Science 82
- Artificial Intelligence 186
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Neale
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Neale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Neale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Neale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Neale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Neale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Neale. The network helps show where Stephen Neale may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Neale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 283 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 132 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 56 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 48 | |
| 6 | Heavy Hands, Magic, and Scene-Reading Traps | 2007 | 32 |
| 7 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 23 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 16 | Cinema and technology | 1984 | 6 |
| 17 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 2 |
About Stephen Neale
Stephen Neale is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics, History and Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 34 papers that have together received 856 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (422 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (473 citations), Philosophy (309 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (82 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (186 citations). Stephen Neale has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter Ludlow, David F. Austin, Stephen Schiffer and Michael Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Screen, Linguistics and Philosophy, Philosophical Perspectives, Mind & Language and Philosophical Issues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.