Emilio Rojo

1.2k citations
51 papers · 838 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Emilio Rojo

47 papers receiving 820 citations

Peers

Emilio Rojo
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 492
  • Biological Psychiatry 33
  • Pharmacology 98
  • Clinical Psychology 115
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 105
Replace Xiao‐Lan Cao with:
Xiao‐Lan Cao China
Lucia Sideli Italy
Duk‐In Jon South Korea
Sofia Brissos Portugal
Natalie Maples United States
Isobel Harrison United Kingdom
Philip John Tyson United Kingdom
Nikolai Albert Denmark
Daniele La Barbera Italy
Sidney Zisook United States
Emilio Rojo relative to Xiao‐Lan Cao China Xiao‐Lan Cao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Xiao‐Lan Cao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emilio Rojo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emilio Rojo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emilio Rojo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emilio Rojo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emilio Rojo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emilio Rojo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emilio Rojo. The network helps show where Emilio Rojo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emilio Rojo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emilio Rojo Line = papers co-authored together Emilio Rojo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200783
2 201264
3 200957
4 201750
5 201143
6
Neurodevelopment or neurodegeneration: review of theories of schizophrenia.
201643
7 200940
8
[A brief scale to assess cognitive impairment in psychiatric patients].
200639
9 201338
10 201437
11 200532
12 201822
13 200520
14 200920
15 201720
16 201816
17 200516
18 201415
19 200513
20 200413

About Emilio Rojo

Emilio Rojo is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 838 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (22 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (5 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (5 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (492 citations), Biological Psychiatry (33 citations), Pharmacology (98 citations), Clinical Psychology (115 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations). Emilio Rojo has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Juana Gómez‐Benito, Georgina Guilera, Óscar Pino, Scot E. Purdon, Javier Rejas, Eduard Vieta, Rafael Tabarés‐Seisdedos, Manuel J. Cuesta, Benedicto Crespo‐Facorro and Manuel Franco. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Schizophrenia Research, BMJ Open, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact