Ellen Messer

55 papers receiving 938 citations

Peers

Ellen Messer
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 210
  • Anthropology 120
  • Food Science 181
  • General Health Professions 223
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70
Replace Elizabeth Byron with:
Elizabeth Byron United States
Elliot Fratkin United States
Billie R. DeWalt United States
Ruth J. Prince Norway
Eugene N. Anderson United States
Barbara Miller United States
Darlene McNaughton Australia
Bruce Frayne Canada
Anke Niehof Netherlands
Sue Booth Australia
Ellen Messer relative to Elizabeth Byron United States Elizabeth Byron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Elizabeth Byron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Messer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Messer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Messer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Messer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Messer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Messer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Messer. The network helps show where Ellen Messer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Messer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen Messer Line = papers co-authored together Ellen Messer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984121
2 1997115
3 199387
4 199380
5 200068
6
Research methods in nutritional anthropology
198958
7 199658
8 198152
9 199939
10 198733
11 201331
12 200928
13 198926
14 198626
15 200225
16 199725
17 199519
18 200219
19
Zapotec plant knowledge : classification, uses, and communication about plants in Mitla, Oaxaca, Mexico
197517
20 202017

About Ellen Messer

Ellen Messer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (12 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (9 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (7 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (3 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers) and Human Rights and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (210 citations), Anthropology (120 citations), Food Science (181 citations), General Health Professions (223 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (70 citations). Ellen Messer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, El Salvador and France. Frequent co-authors include George M. Foster, Pertti J. Pelto, Gretel H. Pelto, Marc J. Cohen, Laurie F. DeRose, Sara Millman, Elizabeth M. Ross, Frances Moore Lappé, Peter Heywood and Robin Broad. Their work appears in journals such as Food and Nutrition Bulletin, Annual Review of Anthropology, Social Science & Medicine, Food and Foodways and Nutrients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact