Sue Booth

2.7k citations
75 papers · 1.9k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Sue Booth

71 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Sue Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Pharmacy 208
  • General Health Professions 1.0k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 292
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 515
  • Food Science 205
Replace Gwen E. Chapman with:
Gwen E. Chapman Canada
Danielle Gallegos Australia
Linda C. Garro United States
Christine E. Blake United States
James Hersey United States
Martin Caraher United Kingdom
Kathryn Backett‐Milburn United Kingdom
Alicia L. Salvatore United States
Garry Auld United States
Christina Pollard Australia
Sue Booth relative to Gwen E. Chapman Canada Gwen E. Chapman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Gwen E. Chapman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sue Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sue Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sue Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sue Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sue Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sue Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sue Booth. The network helps show where Sue Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sue Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sue Booth Line = papers co-authored together Sue Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019173
2 2017117
3 200795
4 201490
5 199980
6
Australian GPs' perceptions about child and adolescent overweight and obesity: the Weight of Opinion study.
200770
7 199967
8 201466
9 200762
10 201954
11 200353
12 199550
13 200946
14 200643
15 201543
16 200340
17 201839
18 200734
19 202033
20 199033

About Sue Booth

Sue Booth is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Plant Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (38 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (22 papers), Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (11 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (9 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (9 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (5 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (208 citations), General Health Professions (1.0k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (292 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (515 citations) and Food Science (205 citations). Sue Booth has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Christina Pollard, John Coveney, Jillian Whelan, Mariana Chilton, Lesley King, Deanna L. Pagnini, Michael Booth, Kaye Mehta, Lisa Perkins and Georgia Middleton. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Public Health Nutrition, British Food Journal, Health Promotion International and Health Promotion Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact