Ellen Loots

33 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Ellen Loots
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Urban Studies 162
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 117
  • Business and International Management 11
  • Music 17
  • Museology 19
Replace Stoyan V. Sgourev with:
Stoyan V. Sgourev France
Chris Bilton United Kingdom
Erik Hitters Netherlands
Dimitrinka Stoyanova Russell United Kingdom
Eduardo Davel Brazil
Peter L. Higgs Australia
Tomas Kačerauskas Lithuania
Lénia Marques Netherlands
Liz Moor United Kingdom
Mehita Iqani South Africa
Ellen Loots relative to Stoyan V. Sgourev France Stoyan V. Sgourev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stoyan V. Sgourev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Loots

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Loots's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Loots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Loots more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Loots

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Loots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Loots. The network helps show where Ellen Loots may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Loots, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen Loots Line = papers co-authored together Ellen Loots links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202070
2 202038
3 201931
4 201828
5 201826
6 202024
7 201816
8 202011
9 202011
10
Compete or cooperate in the creative industries? A quasi-experimental study with Dutch cultural and creative entrepreneurs
201810
11 20199
12 20218
13 20257
14 20227
15 20217
16 20207
17 20237
18 20227
19 20216
20 20236

About Ellen Loots

Ellen Loots is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Management of Technology and Innovation, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (27 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (15 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (10 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (2 papers), Regional resilience and development (2 papers) and Art History and Market Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (162 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (117 citations), Business and International Management (11 citations), Music (17 citations) and Museology (19 citations). Ellen Loots has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include A. van Witteloostuijn, Pawan V. Bhansing, Lénia Marques, Mariangela Lavanga, Luís Carvalho, Johanna Vanderstraeten, Wim Coreynen, Hendrik Slabbinck, Miia Martinsuo and Koen Vandenbempt. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cultural Policy, Journal of Education and Work, Cultural Trends, Creative Industries Journal and Journal of Cultural Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact