Journal of Cultural Economics

892 papers and 16.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 892 papers published in Journal of Cultural Economics in the last decades have received a total of 16.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Cultural Economics usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (364 papers), Urban Studies (334 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (326 papers) specifically the topics of Art History and Market Analysis (357 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (333 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Cultural Economics are David Throsby, W. David Walls, Douglas S. Noonan, Bruno S. Frey, John O’Hagan, Călin Vâlsan, Arthur De Vany, Samuel Cameron, Trine Bille and Roxana Mihet.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Cultural Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Cultural Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Cultural Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Cultural Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Cultural Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Cultural Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Cultural Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025