Èlia Òbis

23 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

Èlia Òbis
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Aging 27
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 159
  • Clinical Biochemistry 33
  • Physiology 113
Replace Claudia Savoia with:
Claudia Savoia Italy
Birgit Honrath Germany
Maria Bindu Bagh United States
Julie Faitg United Kingdom
Anna Gioran Greece
Judit Perez Ortiz United States
Zahra Ashkavand United States
Francesca Trippi Italy
Francesca Potenza Italy
Tamara Azarashvili Russia
Èlia Òbis relative to Claudia Savoia Italy Claudia Savoia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Claudia Savoia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Èlia Òbis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Èlia Òbis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Èlia Òbis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Èlia Òbis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Èlia Òbis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Èlia Òbis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Èlia Òbis. The network helps show where Èlia Òbis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Èlia Òbis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Èlia Òbis Line = papers co-authored together Èlia Òbis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201265
2 201355
3 201653
4 201037
5 200936
6 201436
7 201634
8 202034
9 202025
10 202323
11 201620
12 202318
13 202318
14 202018
15 202117
16 202316
17 202115
18 202411
19 20224
20 20233

About Èlia Òbis

Èlia Òbis is a scholar working on Physiology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (7 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (4 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers) and Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (27 citations), Biological Psychiatry (21 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (159 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (33 citations) and Physiology (113 citations). Èlia Òbis has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Austria and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Joaquim Ros, Jordi Tamarit, Reinald Pamplona, Mariona Jové, Elisa Cabiscol, Natàlia Mota‐Martorell, Manuel Portero‐Otín, Joaquim Sol Culleré, Stefka Mincheva-Tasheva and Verónica Patricia Irazusta. Their work appears in journals such as Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Antioxidants, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Aging Cell and Journal of science and medicine in sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact