Eileen O’Neill

41 papers receiving 789 citations

Peers

Eileen O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 52
  • Family Practice 64
  • History and Philosophy of Science 156
  • Research and Theory 22
  • Health Information Management 58
Replace Barbara Richardson with:
Barbara Richardson United Kingdom
Suzanne Denieffe Ireland
Sara Owen United Kingdom
Steven L. Kanter United States
Stephen J. Cavanagh United Kingdom
Barbara Adamson Australia
Kelly Fryer‐Edwards United States
J.F.A. Pruyn Netherlands
P. H. Harasym Canada
Daniel J. Brauner United States
Eileen O’Neill relative to Barbara Richardson United Kingdom Barbara Richardson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×50×100×156×
Barbara Richardson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eileen O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eileen O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eileen O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eileen O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eileen O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eileen O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eileen O’Neill. The network helps show where Eileen O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eileen O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eileen O’Neill Line = papers co-authored together Eileen O’Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006139
2 200487
3 198780
4 200262
5 200154
6 199745
7 200043
8 200540
9 200433
10 199531
11 200025
12 199724
13 200523
14 198822
15 201920
16 201819
17 200017
18 200615
19 199914
20 199413

About Eileen O’Neill

Eileen O’Neill is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Family Practice, General Health Professions, Artificial Intelligence and Religious studies, having authored 49 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (7 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (52 citations), Family Practice (64 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (156 citations), Research and Theory (22 citations) and Health Information Management (58 citations). Eileen O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nancy M. Dluhy, Louise Ada, Nicholas O’Dwyer, Elizabeth Chin, David Deakins, Christia Mercer, Paul Fortier, Howard Michel, Anne Lazenbatt and Marius Terblanche. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Hypatia, CIN Computers Informatics Nursing, Applied Nursing Research and Journal of the history of philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact