Eike Hoff

816 citations
22 papers · 613 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 12
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 4
    • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 2
    • Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 1

Eike Hoff

22 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Eike Hoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 336
  • Health 43
  • Family Practice 8
  • Surgery 181
  • Communication 31
Replace Nael Shanti with:
Nael Shanti United States
Wade King Australia
Gilles Dubois France
Dongwook Han South Korea
Dennis M. Marchiori United States
Anna Anderson United Kingdom
A. Sama United States
Nicholas C. Schiller United States
Derek Khorsand United States
Sadiqa Syed Pakistan
Eike Hoff relative to Nael Shanti United States Nael Shanti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Nael Shanti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eike Hoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eike Hoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eike Hoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eike Hoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eike Hoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eike Hoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eike Hoff. The network helps show where Eike Hoff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eike Hoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eike Hoff Line = papers co-authored together Eike Hoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201189
2 201684
3 201060
4 201057
5 201552
6 201447
7 201439
8 201533
9 201426
10 201524
11 201316
12 201316
13 201916
14 201111
15 201210
16 20139
17 20109
18 20128
19 20113
20 20152

About Eike Hoff

Eike Hoff is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Health, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 613 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (12 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Social Media in Health Education (2 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Bone and Joint Diseases (1 paper) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (336 citations), Health (43 citations), Family Practice (8 citations), Surgery (181 citations) and Communication (31 citations). Eike Hoff has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Putzier, Patrick Strube, Carsten Perka, Christian Groß, Tony Hartwig, Kai Sostmann, David Alexander Back, Stephan Tohtz, Florian Streitparth and Harm Peters. Their work appears in journals such as European Spine Journal, Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication, Journal of surgical education, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and The Spine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact