Hendrik Schmidt

8.3k citations
187 papers · 6.0k · h-index 43

Impact in

Papers in

Hendrik Schmidt

170 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

Hendrik Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 3.8k
  • Pharmacology 2.4k
  • Surgery 2.3k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 348
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.7k
Replace Wafa Skalli with:
Wafa Skalli France
Chris J. Snijders Netherlands
Martin H. Krag United States
Paul Pynsent United Kingdom
Kevin J. McQuade United States
John M. Cavanaugh United States
Anthony Sances United States
Carl Hirsch Sweden
Oh-Yun Kwon South Korea
Kevin T. Foley United States
Hendrik Schmidt relative to Wafa Skalli France Wafa Skalli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Wafa Skalli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hendrik Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hendrik Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hendrik Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hendrik Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hendrik Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hendrik Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hendrik Schmidt. The network helps show where Hendrik Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hendrik Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hendrik Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Hendrik Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 187 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014321
2 2006298
3 2005292
4 2007228
5 2007225
6 2006207
7 2015180
8 2006163
9 2014130
10 2007127
11 2010126
12 2007121
13 2012109
14 2010100
15 200995
16 201395
17 201489
18 200686
19 201985
20 200882

About Hendrik Schmidt

Hendrik Schmidt is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Small Animals, having authored 187 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (106 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (79 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (33 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (27 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (21 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (9 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (7 papers) and Point processes and geometric inequalities (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (3.8k citations), Pharmacology (2.4k citations), Surgery (2.3k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (348 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (1.7k citations). Hendrik Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Joachim Wilke, Frank Heuer, A. Rohlmann, L. Claes, Thomas Zander, Marcel Dreischarf, A. Shirazi‐Adl, Fabio Galbusera, Sandra Reitmaier and G. Bergmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomechanics, European Spine Journal, Clinical Biomechanics, Scientific Reports and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact