Edwin T. Harper

21 papers receiving 698 citations

Peers

Edwin T. Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Toxicology 57
  • Biochemistry 60
  • Molecular Biology 395
  • Organic Chemistry 153
  • Clinical Biochemistry 31
Replace Daniel M. Tal with:
Daniel M. Tal Israel
Serge Halazy France
Richard P. Szajewski
Robert Bruce Moffett United States
Wilfred L.F. Armarego Australia
U. Juhl United States
John M. Mellor United Kingdom
Tadayuki Uno Japan
Christian Marazano France
Amnon Albeck Israel
Edwin T. Harper relative to Daniel M. Tal Israel Daniel M. Tal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Daniel M. Tal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin T. Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin T. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin T. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin T. Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin T. Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin T. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin T. Harper. The network helps show where Edwin T. Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edwin T. Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin T. Harper Line = papers co-authored together Edwin T. Harper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993263
2 1960103
3 199296
4 196869
5 199639
6 199638
7 198023
8 196514
9 198013
10 198313
11 197112
12 196012
13 197310
14 19917
15 19816
16 19925
17 19964
18 19824
19 19604
20 20001

About Edwin T. Harper

Edwin T. Harper is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Clinical Biochemistry, Biochemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 738 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (4 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers), Biochemical Acid Research Studies (2 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (2 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (57 citations), Biochemistry (60 citations), Molecular Biology (395 citations), Organic Chemistry (153 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (31 citations). Edwin T. Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George D. Rose, Maurice M. Kreevoy, William Bosron, Robert A. Dean, Richard M. Kellogg, A. Paul Schaap, John W. Hawes, Robert A. Harris, David W. Crabb and Albert S. Mildvan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Biochemistry, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Teaching Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact