Edwin M. Tam

37 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Edwin M. Tam
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 459
  • Biological Psychiatry 105
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 60
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 183
  • Pharmacology 153
Replace Eva Hilger with:
Eva Hilger Austria
G.‐J. Wang United States
Euridice Campori Italy
Andrea G. Gillman United States
Rixt F. Riemersma‐van der Lek Netherlands
Amy Ferguson United Kingdom
Hader Mansour United States
Sarah A. Eisenstein United States
Jarmila Hallman Sweden
Cathrin Rohleder Germany
Edwin M. Tam relative to Eva Hilger Austria Eva Hilger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Eva Hilger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin M. Tam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin M. Tam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin M. Tam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin M. Tam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin M. Tam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin M. Tam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin M. Tam. The network helps show where Edwin M. Tam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edwin M. Tam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin M. Tam Line = papers co-authored together Edwin M. Tam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015184
2 2006169
3 200468
4 200166
5 200761
6 201255
7 199749
8 201345
9 199544
10 200032
11 201529
12 200029
13 199826
14 199726
15 200424
16 200923
17 199922
18 200121
19 200620
20 201620

About Edwin M. Tam

Edwin M. Tam is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (17 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (5 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (459 citations), Biological Psychiatry (105 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (60 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (183 citations) and Pharmacology (153 citations). Edwin M. Tam has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Raymond W. Lam, Lakshmi N. Yatham, Erin E. Michalak, Anthony Levitt, Robert D. Levitan, Athanasios P. Zis, Rachel Morehouse, I‐Shin Shiah, Murray W. Enns and Rajamannar Ramasubbu. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research and Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact