Edward Thorp

10 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Edward Thorp
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Geometry and Topology 150
  • Mathematical Physics 91
  • Applied Mathematics 75
  • Algebra and Number Theory 29
  • Statistics and Probability 50
Replace Thomas E. Armstrong with:
Thomas E. Armstrong United States
Dorothy Maharam United States
Bertram M. Schreiber United States
Kong‐Ming Chong Malaysia
J. E. Jayne United Kingdom
F. Dennis Sentilles United States
Erik Ellentuck United States
Nicolae Dinculeanu United States
Alexandra Bellow United States
R. W. Hansell United States
Edward Thorp relative to Thomas E. Armstrong United States Thomas E. Armstrong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Thomas E. Armstrong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Thorp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Thorp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Thorp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Thorp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Thorp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Thorp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Thorp. The network helps show where Edward Thorp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Edward Thorp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward Thorp Line = papers co-authored together Edward Thorp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1960124
2 196748
3 196041
4 196222
5
The strong maximum modules theorem for analytic functions in Banach spaces
196720
6 196115
7 198314
8 197210
9 196010
10
Poincaré's conjecture and the distribution of digits in tables
19711
11 19710

About Edward Thorp

Edward Thorp is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Statistics and Probability, Numerical Analysis and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 11 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (3 papers), Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (3 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (2 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (2 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (1 paper), Stochastic processes and financial applications (1 paper) and Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (150 citations), Mathematical Physics (91 citations), Applied Mathematics (75 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (29 citations) and Statistics and Probability (50 citations). Edward Thorp has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Berthold Schweizer, A. Sklar, Robert Whitley, Jerome B. Baesel and William E. Walden. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, The Journal of Finance, Compositio Mathematica and Information Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact