Edith Greene
Impact in
- Law top 0.05%
- Jury Decision Making Processes
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations
- Law in Society and Culture
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth F. Loftus (16 shared papers)Walter Kintsch (1 shared paper)Mary Dodge (2 shared papers)Susan Morison (1 shared paper)Bruce Furie (1 shared paper)Barbara C. Furie (1 shared paper)Martha S. Feldman (1 shared paper)W. Lance Bennett (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Law and Human Behavior (14 papers)Behavioral Sciences & the Law (7 papers)Journal of Applied Social Psychology (3 papers)Psychology Public Policy and Law (3 papers)The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesLatviaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Edith Greene
57 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Law 696
- General Decision Sciences 64
- Cognitive Neuroscience 553
- Gender Studies 269
- Social Psychology 542
Countries citing papers authored by Edith Greene
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Greene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Greene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Greene. The network helps show where Edith Greene may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Greene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 190 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 179 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 128 | |
| 4 | 1980 | 106 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 99 | |
| 6 | 1980 | 92 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 71 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 61 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 54 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 52 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 50 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 48 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 45 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 42 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 38 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 34 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 34 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 33 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 33 |
About Edith Greene
Edith Greene is a scholar working on Law, Pharmacy, Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jury Decision Making Processes (30 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (14 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (13 papers), Law in Society and Culture (12 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (10 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (7 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (696 citations), General Decision Sciences (64 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (553 citations), Gender Studies (269 citations) and Social Psychology (542 citations). Edith Greene has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth F. Loftus, Walter Kintsch, Mary Dodge, Susan Morison, Bruce Furie, Barbara C. Furie, Martha S. Feldman, W. Lance Bennett, Brian Stephen Cahill and Brian H. Bornstein. Their work appears in journals such as Law and Human Behavior, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Psychology Public Policy and Law and The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.