Edith Greene
Impact in
- Law top 0.05%
- Jury Decision Making Processes
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations
- Law in Society and Culture
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
Papers in
- Law 34
- Jury Decision Making Processes 32
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 14
- Law in Society and Culture 13
-
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 15
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth F. Loftus (16 shared papers)Walter Kintsch (1 shared paper)Mary Dodge (2 shared papers)Susan Morison (1 shared paper)W. Lance Bennett (1 shared paper)Martha S. Feldman (1 shared paper)Bruce Furie (1 shared paper)Barbara C. Furie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Law and Human Behavior (15 papers)Behavioral Sciences & the Law (7 papers)Journal of Applied Social Psychology (3 papers)Psychology Public Policy and Law (3 papers)Journal of Applied Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesLatviaCanada
In The Last Decade
Edith Greene
59 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Law 753
- General Decision Sciences 67
- Cognitive Neuroscience 560
- Gender Studies 280
- Social Psychology 563
Countries citing papers authored by Edith Greene
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Greene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Greene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Greene. The network helps show where Edith Greene may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Greene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 194 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 179 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 133 | |
| 4 | 1980 | 106 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 92 | |
| 6 | 1980 | 92 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 71 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 67 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 59 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 58 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 49 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 48 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 44 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 43 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 40 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 37 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 35 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 35 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 34 |
About Edith Greene
Edith Greene is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jury Decision Making Processes (32 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (15 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (14 papers), Law in Society and Culture (13 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (10 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (8 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (753 citations), General Decision Sciences (67 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (560 citations), Gender Studies (280 citations) and Social Psychology (563 citations). Edith Greene has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth F. Loftus, Walter Kintsch, Mary Dodge, Susan Morison, W. Lance Bennett, Martha S. Feldman, Bruce Furie, Barbara C. Furie, Brian S. Cahill and Bryan Myers. Their work appears in journals such as Law and Human Behavior, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Psychology Public Policy and Law and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.