Ed Day

141 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Ed Day's Hit Papers

Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence: a systematic review and economic evaluation 2007 · 466 citations
4660+6+12Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Ed Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Transplantation 66
  • Epidemiology 819
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 636
  • General Health Professions 411
  • Neurology 236
Replace Jens Reimer with:
Jens Reimer Germany
Yeşim Erim Germany
Ashley E. Thompson United States
Howard H. Moffet United States
Jakob Manthey Germany
Yehuda Neumark Israel
Michael Friedman United States
Bonnie L. Svarstad United States
Joshua D. Brown United States
Anne M. Libby United States
Ed Day relative to Jens Reimer Germany Jens Reimer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jens Reimer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ed Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ed Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ed Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ed Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ed Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ed Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ed Day. The network helps show where Ed Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ed Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ed Day Line = papers co-authored together Ed Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 145 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence: a systematic review and economic evaluation
Hit paper breakdown →
2007466
2 2019118
3 2004113
4 2013112
5 200796
6 200485
7 200880
8 201471
9 201769
10 200357
11 201357
12 200955
13 201040
14 200538
15 202137
16 201336
17 201635
18 201635
19 200533
20 200532

About Ed Day

Ed Day is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 145 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (48 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (31 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (17 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (12 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (8 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (7 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (66 citations), Epidemiology (819 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (636 citations), General Health Professions (411 citations) and Neurology (236 citations). Ed Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Best, Alex Copello, Emma Frew, Sanju George, John Strang, James H.F. Rudd, A. Juarez-Garcia, Sue Jowett, Amanda Burls and Tracy Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction, Addiction Research & Theory, European Addiction Research, Health Technology Assessment and Drug and Alcohol Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact