É. Wenisch

17 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

É. Wenisch
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 300
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 16
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 37
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 162
  • Rehabilitation 29
Replace Rachel Hammersley‐Mather with:
Rachel Hammersley‐Mather Australia
Yoonseok Huh South Korea
Juan Luis Sánchez Spain
Ben Schmand Netherlands
Luca Kleineidam Germany
Montse Pujol Spain
Katherine Hackett United States
Alexandra Wade Australia
Leonardo Caixeta Brazil
Paul Brewster Canada
É. Wenisch relative to Rachel Hammersley‐Mather Australia Rachel Hammersley‐Mather's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Rachel Hammersley‐Mather · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by É. Wenisch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of É. Wenisch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by É. Wenisch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites É. Wenisch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by É. Wenisch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by É. Wenisch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by É. Wenisch. The network helps show where É. Wenisch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside É. Wenisch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with É. Wenisch Line = papers co-authored together É. Wenisch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2007157
2 200770
3 201066
4 201341
5 200541
6 200619
7 200217
8 200715
9 201514
10 201713
11 200512
12 20058
13 20064
14 20093
15 20103
16 20062
17 20051
18 20151
19 20061

About É. Wenisch

É. Wenisch is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics and General Health Professions, having authored 19 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Trace Elements in Health (4 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (300 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (16 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (37 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (162 citations) and Rehabilitation (29 citations). É. Wenisch has collaborated with scholars based in France, Bulgaria and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jocelyne de Rotrou, Anne‐Sophie Rigaud, Olivier Hanon, F. Latour, Latchezar Traykov, Nadine Raoux, Philippe Rémy, Sophie Baudic, V. Faucounau and A.‐S. Rigaud. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neurology, Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Aging Clinical and Experimental Research and L Encéphale.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact