Ben Schmand

7 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers

Ben Schmand
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 395
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 16
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 22
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 99
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 61
Replace H. Beaumont with:
H. Beaumont United Kingdom
Filipa Ribeiro Portugal
Cláudia Sellitto Porto Brazil
Melanie C. Greenaway United States
Alexander Koppara Germany
Julia Hartmann Germany
Cristina Lojo‐Seoane Spain
Deborah M. Girling United Kingdom
Jet M. J. Vonk United States
Linda W. Duke United States
Ben Schmand relative to H. Beaumont United Kingdom H. Beaumont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H. Beaumont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Schmand

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Schmand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Schmand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Schmand more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Schmand

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Schmand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Schmand. The network helps show where Ben Schmand may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Ben Schmand, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Schmand Line = papers co-authored together Ben Schmand links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 1996289
2 1998120
3 199796
4 199860
5 199942
6 201912
7
[Validity of the cognitive screening tests and the mini-mental status examination in a group of elderly hospital patients].
19917

About Ben Schmand

Ben Schmand is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Family Practice, having authored 7 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Aging and Gerontology Research (1 paper) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (395 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (16 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (61 citations). Ben Schmand has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Lindeboom, Cees Jonker, Chris Hooijer, Louis M. Havekes, Lenore J. Launer, Mirjam I. Geerlings, Betto G. Deelman, Carolien Smits, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx and Dorly J. H. Deeg. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Neurology and Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact