Julia Fredrickson

715 citations
18 papers · 523 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Fredrickson

17 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Julia Fredrickson
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 161
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 68
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
  • Clinical Psychology 64
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 55
Replace Haifeng Zhang with:
Haifeng Zhang China
Carol Dillon Argentina
Kimberly Huber United States
Eleonora Stella Italy
Lene Hammer-Helmich Denmark
Sadaf Arefi Milani United States
Hyo Shin Kang South Korea
Minna J. Hynninen Norway
Polly W.C. Li Hong Kong
Rianne M. van der Linde United Kingdom
Julia Fredrickson relative to Haifeng Zhang China Haifeng Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Haifeng Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Fredrickson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Fredrickson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Fredrickson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Fredrickson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Fredrickson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Fredrickson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Fredrickson. The network helps show where Julia Fredrickson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Fredrickson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Fredrickson Line = papers co-authored together Julia Fredrickson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2009197
2 201184
3 201266
4 201538
5 201333
6 201130
7 201317
8 201717
9 201813
10 20098
11 20145
12 20235
13 20234
14 20252
15 20092
16 20221
17
Prosocial Behavior and Teamwork in Online Computer Games
20111
18 20250

About Julia Fredrickson

Julia Fredrickson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pharmacy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (161 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (68 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations), Clinical Psychology (64 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (55 citations). Julia Fredrickson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Mark Woodward, David Darby, Paul Maruff, Amy Fredrickson, Lynette Moore, Robert H. Pietrzak, Marita P. McCabe, Boyd Swinburn, Peter Kremer and John H. Krystal. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Neuroepidemiology, Acta Paediatrica, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry and Body Image.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact