E. Müller

5.9k citations
117 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

E. Müller

96 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

E. Müller
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 318
  • Computer Science Applications 113
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 35
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 189
  • Organic Chemistry 239
Replace Klaus Woelk with:
Klaus Woelk United States
Jürgen Schulte Australia
R. D. Knight United States
Robert Parson United States
Andrew Rasmussen United States
William F. Polik United States
Stefan E. Huber Austria
W. White United States
Sunil Nair India
Lars Asplund Sweden
E. Müller relative to Klaus Woelk United States Klaus Woelk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×80×94.5×
Klaus Woelk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Müller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Müller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Müller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Müller. The network helps show where E. Müller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Müller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Müller Line = papers co-authored together E. Müller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Cluster Magnetic Fields from Galactic Outflows
200990
2 201888
3 198450
4 198848
5 198243
6 201940
7 198238
8 201832
9 201831
10 202031
11 202030
12 199229
13 196125
14 200724
15 199022
16 199122
17 200621
18 202020
19 198420
20 200719

About E. Müller

E. Müller is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Education, Computer Science Applications and Organic Chemistry, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (16 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (12 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (12 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (9 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (8 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (7 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (318 citations), Computer Science Applications (113 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (35 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (189 citations) and Organic Chemistry (239 citations). E. Müller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Chantal Buteau, Karine De Oliveira Vigier, François Jérôme, H. Lesch, F. Mast, Raphaël Wischert, Changru Ma, Marc Pera‐Titus, H. Niedermeyer and Didier Le Morvan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Fusion, Green Chemistry, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and ChemSusChem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact