Е. И. Рогаев

166 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Е. И. Рогаев
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Biological Psychiatry 159
  • Aging 115
  • Physiology 1.4k
  • Neurology 335
  • Cancer Research 522
Replace Angelo Poletti with:
Angelo Poletti Italy
Helmut Fuchs Germany
Odile Kellermann France
Anatoli S. Gleiberman United States
Paul C. Orban Canada
Mina Ryten United Kingdom
Angeleen Fleming United Kingdom
Minesuke Yokoyama Japan
Mark Lathrop France
Kirby D. Smith United States
Е. И. Рогаев relative to Angelo Poletti Italy Angelo Poletti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Angelo Poletti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Е. И. Рогаев

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Е. И. Рогаев's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Е. И. Рогаев with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Е. И. Рогаев more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Е. И. Рогаев

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Е. И. Рогаев. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Е. И. Рогаев. The network helps show where Е. И. Рогаев may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Е. И. Рогаев, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Е. И. Рогаев Line = papers co-authored together Е. И. Рогаев links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 174 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995438
2 2008245
3 2009224
4 2001166
5 2021144
6 2006141
7 2004137
8 2016125
9 1997117
10 2006104
11 2012100
12 200796
13 200085
14 200777
15 201072
16 200972
17 201364
18 201263
19 199761
20 200260

About Е. И. Рогаев

Е. И. Рогаев is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 174 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (41 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (14 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (10 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (10 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (9 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers) and Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (159 citations), Aging (115 citations), Physiology (1.4k citations), Neurology (335 citations) and Cancer Research (522 citations). Е. И. Рогаев has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, United States and Tajikistan. Frequent co-authors include Anastasia P. Grigorenko, Walter J. Lukiw, Т. В. Андреева, Schahram Akbarian, Peter St George‐Hyslop, Yuri K. Moliaka, Jerry W. Shay, Mieczyslaw A. Piatyszek, Edwin Chang and Richard Allsopp. Their work appears in journals such as Human Molecular Genetics, Scientific Reports, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact