E. Chleide

604 citations
21 papers · 530 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

E. Chleide

20 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers

E. Chleide
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 224
  • Biological Psychiatry 26
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 57
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 24
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 78
Replace Mary Cohen-Williams with:
Mary Cohen-Williams United States
Mark J. Benvenga United States
M. Steinmann Switzerland
Marie‐Claude Burgevin France
P J Vaysse United States
Alyssa B. O'Neill United States
Christopher J. Pycock United Kingdom
P Jenner United Kingdom
M. C. W. Minchin United Kingdom
Édith Doucet France
E. Chleide relative to Mary Cohen-Williams United States Mary Cohen-Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mary Cohen-Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Chleide

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Chleide's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Chleide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Chleide more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Chleide

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Chleide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Chleide. The network helps show where E. Chleide may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside E. Chleide, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Chleide Line = papers co-authored together E. Chleide links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993182
2 199481
3 199050
4 199342
5 199037
6 199127
7 199018
8 199217
9 199313
10 199111
11 199011
12 19918
13 19987
14 19906
15 19886
16 19914
17 19884
18 19932
19 19912
20 19941

About E. Chleide

E. Chleide is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (3 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (224 citations), Biological Psychiatry (26 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (57 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (24 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (78 citations). E. Chleide has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jacques Bruhwyler, Jean‐François Liégeois, M. Mercier, J. Delarge, J. Damas, J. Delarge, Koichi Ishikawa, A Dresse, Emmanuel Decamp and Marie‐Claire Rettori. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Behavioural Pharmacology, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact